Generic recovery scores treat every athlete the same. We don't. Ready. learns the patterns specific to your physiology — so you and your coach can train smarter, recover honestly, and race ready.
Consumer wearables run population-average algorithms. They were calibrated on general users, not competitive athletes. For sprint and power athletes, the predictions systematically miss what actually drives readiness — and the advice they offer is generic.
Serious athletes need something different: a system that learns your patterns from your data, surfaces what actually predicts your best sessions, and respects that you and your coach own the decisions.
I'm a 42-year-old competitive sprinter and a senior software developer. I needed a recovery tool that respected my training, my coach, and my data. Nothing existing did. So I built it for myself first — then opened it up.
The Peak Readiness chart shows your current state across six predictive markers — calibrated against your historical best sessions, not a generic benchmark. The shape tells you everything: balanced and large means ready; lopsided or collapsed means strained. No verdict, no prescription. Just visibility.
A GitHub-style heatmap shows the whole season at a glance. Blue days are strain — darker means harder. Green days are recovery — darker means stronger physiological response. Lopsided patterns become obvious. Trends emerge. The shape of your training year stops being a feeling and becomes a fact.
The personal correlation engine watches your data across weeks and surfaces patterns specific to your physiology. The literature averages everyone together — your data tells you what works for you, specifically. The result: smarter recovery decisions, not more interventions.
In April–May 2026 I ran my own data through the system: 31 days, 27 sessions, 28 check-ins. The patterns it surfaced lined up with what my coaches had been observing trackside.
Every vmax session I rated ≥ 8/10 had a resting HR ≤ 58 bpm. Every session ≤ 7/10 had HR ≥ 60. 100% separation — outperforming both Garmin readiness and the composite score.
Garmin readiness 76–88, HRV ≥ 38, resting HR ≤ 58. When all aligned, I executed at my ceiling: 8.5 seconds over 80m. Outside it, the gap opened fast.
After consecutive race days my composite read "recovered" while I was actually depleted. Parasympathetic rebound inflated the markers. The system caught it. The score alone would have missed it.
Three race days in a row dropped my execution from 7 → 6 → 5. HRV fell 19%, resting HR rose. Garmin's readiness bounced in 24 hours. The neural markers didn't.
Wickets at RPE ≥ 7 were the #1 cause of next-day adductor soreness. Strength and easy wickets never caused it. A specific, actionable insight from the data.
My coaches independently validated every finding from their trackside observations. Strong corroboration for one athlete. The beta is now testing whether the same methodology surfaces useful patterns for others.
Ready. for coaches gives you one dashboard for every athlete you work with. Their state, their patterns, the things they're not telling you. Without replacing your judgment — just amplifying your awareness.
Sleep, HRV, resting HR, body battery, training readiness — all flow in automatically. No manual entry of physiological data.
30-second daily check-in: fatigue, mood, soreness, niggles. After each session: type, RPE, execution score. That's it.
After 4–6 weeks the system has enough data to show your personal zones, your peak readiness conditions, and what actually helps you recover.
We want serious athletes and coaches using the system while we validate the methodology. After launch, individual use stays affordable.
Free during beta. Onboarding competitive athletes and their coaches — track, masters, club-level.